Entries from May 2005 ↓
May 29th, 2005 — Ivory towers, Shenanigans
Someone has anonymously posted fliers around Southern Oregon University calling for the killing of homosexuals. School officials are “shocked”. No one has claimed responsibility for the fliers. The creator(s) remain unknown.
In response to the publicity, SOU President Elisabeth Zinser has proposed a 10-point plan to combat hate-crimes. In doing so, Ms. Zinser is ignoring recent history – faking hate crimes. Michelle Malkin has been documenting this trend.
Before SOU goes on a homophobia witch-hunt, how about making sure the fliers aren’t bogus.
May 29th, 2005 — Business
If Doritos taste better now, did they taste worse before they were made ‘Nacho Cheesier’?
May 29th, 2005 — Family life
How can such a cute kitty be such terror?
May 28th, 2005 — Politics, Strange people
The Denver Commission to End Homelessness has set a lofty goal. They are going to end homelessness in Denver within 10 years through an approach that is popular with other cities. The focus of their plan is “Housing First”. They believe that homelessness is caused by poverty. Therefore, if you give people a home, they will be able to solve their poverty.
A Rocky Mountain News editorial points out the problem with the program:
In Housing First, surprisingly, the homeless are not required to get treatment as a condition for housing, although the expectation is that they will once they are in a stable environment.
The housing first approach assumes that poverty leads to addiction. The Denver commision has it exactly backwards. The Rocky cites a well known Denver columnist’s who investigated the homeless issue. He concluded that although problems like batterings, unemployment, and medical issues were listed as the official cause of homelessness there was a common element behind these problems – substance abuse.
This is why government is not the solution to these problems. Giving people a place to live rent free without requiring them to seek treatment for their substance abuse will do nothing to solve the homeless problem. It was not poverty that lead to homelessness and substance abuse. It was substance abuse that led to poverty and homelessness. Housing First only perpetuates the problem by enabling people to sustain their substance abuse inside government housing. We are going to end up with a government program that uses tax dollars to sustain poverty rather than solve it.
This is why I am for more private and faith based intervention programs like Step 13 in Denver. They don’t take government money because the government will prevent them from requiring people to receive substance abuse treatment in their program.
Any program that hopes to be rehabilitate the homeless must first address substance abuse (or mental health) before it will be successful.
May 22nd, 2005 — Business, Shenanigans
Wendy’s CEO Jack Schuessler published an article in the Wall Street Journal on lessons his company learned from the false claim of a fingertip being found in their chili. Mr. Schuessler pointed out the hoax led to a 50% drop in revenue in San Jose (where the claim was made). He also wrote about how it affected workers.
There was only one part of the article I found disingenuous.
It might have been expedient to pay off the accuser in an attempt to end the media onslaught–after all, that is the preferred form of capitulation in this trial-lawyer-driven age; but we never considered this option.
Mr Shuessler also compliments his customers who “appreciate the fact that we protected our brand and didn’t simply try to “make it go away.”
In reality, Wendy’s did not have the option to buy their way out of it. Mr. Schuessler even explained why earlier in the article. “Within an hour [of the claim being made] the story was on TV news, and soon after, Wendy’s was fodder for Jay Leno.”
The news coverage was so massive that Wendy’s had no choice but to fight it. If Wendy’s had tried to pay off the woman making the accusation, the public would have taken that as an admission of guilt. The 50% drop in the San Jose area would have been nothing compared to the empty stores they would have had across the country.
Wendy’s did do the right thing by not caving, but they really had no choice. The woman committing the fraud underestimated the uproar her claim would cause. The scope of the news coverage worked against her. This became clear when she dropped her planned lawsuit.
It was too late for her though; the damage was already done. Wendy’s national reputation was hurt. At that point, the fight was not just to avoid a million dollar lawsuit. They were fighting for the life of their business. It wasn’t about a million dollars. It was about the three billion dollars in revenue they earn each year.
Yes, Wendy’s did the right thing in this case. I still wonder how many other lawsuits they settle instead of investigating.
May 20th, 2005 — Politics, Strange people
Last year, Republicans and most Democrats figured out that Howard Dean lost any sense of rational thought. He was considered the front runner to be the Democratic nominee for the presidential election when the wheels fell off his campaign and he let loose with the infamous â€œI have a screamâ€?.
Apparently this made him ultimately qualified for his current position as Chairman of the Democratic National Committee where he continues to use the same rationality he had during his scream.
Dean doesnâ€™t like Republicans. He has said he thinks they are evil. Of course evil people should be punished. Right now he has Republican House majority leader Tom Delay at the top of his list. Last week Howard Dean said, “I think Tom DeLay ought to go back to Houston, where he can serve his jail sentence.â€? The remark was made about an investigation by the House ethics committee.
Since Delay has not been charged with a crime, it seems Delayâ€™s biggest offense must be that he is a Republican. When it comes to people who have committed terrorism against our country, Dean is much more thoughtful. During his run for President he was asked about Osama bin Laden. Dean said, “I’ve resisted pronouncing a sentence before guilt is found. I still have this old-fashioned notion that even with people like Osama . . . we should do our best not to, in positions of executive power, not to prejudge jury trials.”
So Dean is convinced that a man who has not been charged with a crime should be in jail while we must not prejudge a terrorist who laughs about killing our citizens. Itâ€™s a sad day when Democrats think the Republican House majority leader is more evil than Osama bin Laden.
Remember, Dean is now the leader of the Democratic Party. His statements reflect the official party line. When did Democrats lose their ability to reason?
May 19th, 2005 — Media matters
Headline as it appeared on yahoo.com news
Latest ‘Star Wars’ movie a box-office hit
May 14th, 2005 — Religion
The Catholic Church acts in two ways to try to further its social agenda. The first is through Catholic Charities where the church acts through private donations to assist people in need. The second is by advocating government programs.
During the past few decades, Catholic voters have generally supported the Democratic Party. This is mostly because the Church has taken a position of supporting socialist policies such as welfare programs. For some reason, the Church has taken the position that the importance of helping the poor through government programs trumps the moral issues it advocates â€“ specifically its pro-life and pro-family positions. Catholics have a history of voting for candidates who promise to “help the disadvantaged” while those same candidates advocate abortions or gay marriage.
Even if helping the poor was the more important issue, history has revealed problems with relying on government to fix it.
Government assistance does not work
People who receive from the government only come to rely on the government, not God.
Churches that advocate more government welfare are undermining their own witness. Welfare recipients donâ€™t thank the taxpayers for what they receive. They come to believe the payments they get are a right and that taxpayers are obligated to support them.
The government does not hold people accountable for changing their lives. Did you know it is illegal for an organization that receives federal money to require the people they help stay off drugs? That is why groups like Step 13 in Denver who work with homeless and street people will not accept government funds. Because they require their clients stay off drugs, they change lives.
Churches should be self-reliant
By relying on the government, the church abandons its responsibilities. Europe shows that charitable giving and involvement decreases as people come to rely on the government for assistance. Look at the great Tsunami last year. Europeans criticized the size of the U.S. governmentâ€™s contribution. They didnâ€™t acknowledge the hundreds of millions of dollars private citizens donated. These contributions dwarfed those of European countries. Europeans private contributions were nothing compared to the generosity of Americans. It is a natural tendency for Europeans not to give since they believe they are already giving through the tax collector.
Reliance on government only hurts the soul. People that receive arenâ€™t grateful; they will change their behavior only reluctantly.
People that are forced to pay the taxes are not involved in the lives of the people they are supporting. They have no influence to improve the behavior of those getting the benefits.
The Catholic Church is large enough to have a great impact on the world. If it were to use its own resources instead of abandoning some of its mission to the government, it could change even more lives.
May 14th, 2005 — Business, Spoiled celebrities, Strange people
Paris Hilton is going to star in a Carl’s Jr. commercial. (Carl’s Jr. is a fast-food chain in the west). She’ll be in a bathing suit slopping soap suds on a Bentley trying to convince young men to go buy a new type of spicy burger.
Makes me want a Big Mac.
May 12th, 2005 — Business, Tech
Microsoft revealed its next video game console today – Xbox 360.
While trying to appeal to video game enthusiasts, Microsoft also designed the product to become an entertainment hub. They hope we’ll be hooking up our stereo and playing our music through it as well.
The new Xbox is scheduled to be released this holiday season, way ahead of the next Playstation. Expect a $300 to $400 price tag.
Sony has been losing the edge on innovation in console games. Xbox may gain some more ground and even turn a profit with this one.